Skip to Main Content

A stronger association, built for the future

Strong today. Ready for tomorrow.

For more than six decades, Federal Retirees has been a strong, credible voice for members. But member expectations, volunteer realities and the demands of a modern national organization have changed. That is why Federal Retirees is examining how its governance and organizational structure could evolve with them.

170K members across Canada
60+ years of advocacy service
One association fighting for you
One association fighting for you A united national voice, informed by members and communities across Canada.

The case for evolution is clear

Member surveys and consultations have shown that, while the current model has served the association, it is increasingly difficult to sustain and does not provide the participation, clarity or flexibility members and volunteers expect today.

Members want a stronger voice

Members want more direct and accessible ways to participate, including the opportunity to vote directly in national director elections.

Volunteers want to focus on what matters

Administrative responsibilities are crowiding out advocacy, engagement, recruitment, members services and community building.

The structure must work better

Unclear roles, multiple governance layers and uneven resources can slow decisions, increase administrative burden and create inconsistent member experiences.

ONLY 1 in 5 branches has enough volunteers

 

 

What governance evolution could make possible – and what standing still may risk

Standing still could mean…

  • More volunteer burnout, vacancies and branch closures.
  • Members remaining disconnected from national decisions.
  • Administartive demands continuing to crowd out impact.
  • Slower decisions and inconsistent support across the country.
  • A structure that becomes harder and more costly to sustain.
  • Greater organizational, governance and compliance risk.

Clearer, more democratic and more sustainable

The next phase is about testing approaches through countrywide pilots, learning from experience and assessing how different options could work in practice.

Governance evolution means exploring organizational changes that could meet the needs of members today and position Federal Retirees to serve them well into the future.

One member, one vote

One option would give give every member the opportunity to vote directly for national directors, with each vote carrying equal weight and regional representation protected through the nominations process.


A more direct member voice

A more sustainable branch model

Participating branches could pilot approaches that reduce administrative burden, support volunteers and deliver a more consistent member experience — wherever members live.


Stronger local connections, less administration

Flexible volunteer action groups

Regional and national action groups could give members new ways to contribute their time, experience and expertise to advocacy priorities and community engagement.


More ways to participate and contribute

  1. Design approaches

    Build a range of pilots with participating branches, members, volunteers and staff

  2. Run the pilots

    Try different ways of organizing work, supporting volunteers and serving members

  3. Measure and compare

    Identify what works, what needs improvement and what concerns must be addressed

  4. Assess next steps

    Use evidence to refine the options and inform decisions before formal structural changes.

No formal changes to branch structure will occur while pilots are underway.

Our mission stays strong.

Evolution protects what members value most

This is not a change to who Federal Retirees is. It is a stronger foundation for delivering the mission members rely on.

Powerful advocacy

Retirement income security, positive and healthy aging, reliable health care, veteran well-being, fairness for federal retirees.

Regional perspective

Local and regional experience will continue to inform national leadership.

Member service

Members will continue to receive trusted support, information and benefits.

Responsible stewardship

Accountability and the association’s not-for-profit status remain protected.

Your questions, concerns and ideas matter

Member and volunteer feedback can identify risks, improve the pilots, test assumptions and help determine which approaches work best in practice. We are committed to listening and communicating clearly as the work proresees.

Frequently asked questions

Every member would have an equal vote in electing national directors. It democratizes and modernizes the association where voting power is not concentrated in a small group. This strengthens fairness and accountability.

A new model should strengthen member and volunteer voice through multiple pathways. One Member-One Vote, Action Groups, local engagement, and clearer feedback channels that ensure member concerns are captured and acted on represent possible solutions by creating mechanisms allowing volunteers and members to brainstorm and share ideas or concerns with the National Board and management.

No, volunteers remain central to the Association. New models may consider reducing the administrative burden on volunteers and expanding the range of available roles, to allow more members to participate in meaningful ways that align with how they would like to contribute. A new model should empower branches to focus on work supporting the Association’s strategic plan (advocacy, member recruitment, and local engagement).

A revised governance structure should reduce duplication across the Association, and create clearer alignment between the National Board, National staff and volunteers.

No. Local engagement remains essential. Under a new governance model, branches may operate differently from today, potentially including staff support and hybrid or remote engagement options, in addition to in-person. Any new model will prioritize sustainable, consistent local activities, while ensuring capacity for targeted organization when needed, for instance, advocacy campaigns during key moments.

This is about sustainability and outcomes. Any improvements that increase efficiency will allow resources to be directed toward member engagement and support, volunteer success, and the delivery of the Association’s priorities.

The Association’s mission is strong — but the current structure is under strain. Volunteer fatigue, role uncertainty, and complex decision-making create real risk. A new model helps safeguard the Association’s long-term sustainability, to keep supporting our membership for decades to come.

You will also see a clearer, more consistent approach to member engagement, more modern pathways for participation, and a stronger focus on the outcomes that matter most to members.

Volunteer roles will be clearer and better supported. A new model will clarify what volunteers are responsible for and how these activities will be supported. It will look to create more focused opportunities to contribute your expertise, clearer mandates and expectations, and improved supports so volunteer time and efforts have the greatest impact.

By reducing internal complexity and volunteer administration, the Association can focus more time and energy on strategic priorities, such as retirement income security, advocacy results, member communications, and stronger recruitment efforts.

No, membership dues will not change as a direct result of governance changes. Funding of the new model will align with the Association’s existing financial framework we have today, which includes regular increases through indexing.

Any changes would be gradual, with ample consideration and consultation efforts taking place with members and volunteers regarding changes to roles, structures, or funding. Once consultations are complete, the Association will seek “in principle” approval before a formal vote is held.

This process began with an audit of our current structure.

We then undertook a consultation process that led to the development of a draft plan.

We have been receiving feedback on that draft plan from volunteers and members. This feedback is informing updates and evolution of the plan.

The final version of the plan will be shared with you, the membership, to review before any vote is held on bringing in these changes.